Linnea

Topics Engaged In

Viewing 22 topics - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
    • Topic
    • Voices
    • Posts
    • Last Post
    • Your very own Avatar user image. This site uses Gravata. It is a central Avatar that powers your public profile, visible wherever you post, comment, and interact online. Use the email that is associated with your email address used for your membership to create a free account at Gravata. If all goes well when you log back into this forum that image uploaded to Gravata will appear here. Gravata is temperamental so be sure you match the exact email you have used when you registered here for membership. Let me know if you have any issues. Go to: Gravatar User Avatar ImageThis site uses Gravata. It is a central Avatar that powers your public profile, visible wherever you post, comment, and interact online. Use the email that is associated with your email address used for your membership to create a free account at Gravata. If all goes well when you log back into this forum that image uploaded to Gravata will appear here. Gravata is temperamental so be sure you match the exact email you have used when you registered here for membership. Let me know if you have any issues. Go to: Gravatar User Avatar Image
      1 2

      Started by: Brian in: How To Get A Forum User Avatar Image

    • 20
    • 30
    • 8 months, 1 week ago

      Helvetic

    • Ai & The Future of Marketing – Discussions and ideas Hey everyone! Being in the Marketing profession I thought I might create a thread for likeminded people to discuss the wild ride we are embarking upon. Open for all to join and share ideas, links to interesting or cutting edge Ai marketing/advertising efforts and developments.  Enjoy =) J.Hey everyone! Being in the Marketing profession I thought I might create a thread for likeminded people to discuss the wild ride we are embarking upon. Open for all to join and share ideas, links to interesting or cutting edge Ai marketing/advertising efforts and developments.  Enjoy =) J.

      Started by: Benevolentking in: Read Multiplex Member Business Ideas

    • 6
    • 13
    • 1 year, 8 months ago

      crypto_proca

    • Brian’s backyard Sun Powered Parabolic mirror driven Stirling engine mastermind I am starting this thread because of what is currently happening in South Africa. Where I live their is daily load shedding (for those unfamiliar with load shedding, it is a phenomena in South Africa where areas in cities and towns  electricity are shut down for extensive periods due to the national grid not having enough capacity to provide electricity to all areas. You can also ask chatgpt to learn more about this ). The situation is getting more serious everyday with possible grid failures in the future and the State enterprise company  not being able to fully fund the necessary repair electricity nor fulfil power generation requests. https://www.news24.com/fin24/economy/eskom-to-post-record-r212-billion-loss-for-the-last-year-20230530 To me Brian's idea of using a parabolic dish and cold air battery seems to be a practical and much more efficient solution to the current crisis in South Africa. Currently private companies and home owners who can afford it are installing solar arrays with lithium batteries +inverters at high cost. Brian's idea is a lot more affordable and I think might empower a lot of people in South Africa with a sustainable supply of electricity. I think Brian's solution is much more practical for what is currently happening South Africa for the following reasons: It seems a lot more cheaper than the current technologies being used to be less independent of the power grid. It seems cheaper to maintain and maybe even easier to install It is something that could possibly be locally produced in South Africa. It seems like a solution that might be faster to implement than the current solar panels for homes. I am specifically speaking about homes with this point. This technology might also be affordable for low income families and not just medium to high income households. It does seem from Brian's tweets that this system (the liquid air battery included) will give enough power for the demands of an average South African household. What are others thoughts on this? I would love to build these things to help people, I am just not sure where to start neither do I have the technical skillset. It seems like a much needed solution for a problem that is affecting my country's economy in real time. Maybe other countries around the world also have a similar problem. I am also not sure about the legal part of this?  Is there certain permissions one has to obtain from US patent office or is there a way to build an air battery that does not infringe copyright that is 100% ethical and legal? I did some research on south african universities who looked at viability of parabolic dishes and their focus was more on using parabolic dishes with lithium batteries and inverters. Would love to hear ideas about this and how this could potentially be turned into reality. Here are some of Brian's tweets that inspired me about this topic: https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1663551747317731335   https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1584916138936643591   https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1584921891248041984      I am starting this thread because of what is currently happening in South Africa. Where I live their is daily load shedding (for those unfamiliar with load shedding, it is a phenomena in South Africa where areas in cities and towns  electricity are shut down for extensive periods due to the national grid not having enough capacity to provide electricity to all areas. You can also ask chatgpt to learn more about this ). The situation is getting more serious everyday with possible grid failures in the future and the State enterprise company  not being able to fully fund the necessary repair electricity nor fulfil power generation requests. https://www.news24.com/fin24/economy/eskom-to-post-record-r212-billion-loss-for-the-last-year-20230530 To me Brian's idea of using a parabolic dish and cold air battery seems to be a practical and much more efficient solution to the current crisis in South Africa. Currently private companies and home owners who can afford it are installing solar arrays with lithium batteries +inverters at high cost. Brian's idea is a lot more affordable and I think might empower a lot of people in South Africa with a sustainable supply of electricity. I think Brian's solution is much more practical for what is currently happening South Africa for the following reasons: It seems a lot more cheaper than the current technologies being used to be less independent of the power grid. It seems cheaper to maintain and maybe even easier to install It is something that could possibly be locally produced in South Africa. It seems like a solution that might be faster to implement than the current solar panels for homes. I am specifically speaking about homes with this point. This technology might also be affordable for low income families and not just medium to high income households. It does seem from Brian's tweets that this system (the liquid air battery included) will give enough power for the demands of an average South African household. What are others thoughts on this? I would love to build these things to help people, I am just not sure where to start neither do I have the technical skillset. It seems like a much needed solution for a problem that is affecting my country's economy in real time. Maybe other countries around the world also have a similar problem. I am also not sure about the legal part of this?  Is there certain permissions one has to obtain from US patent office or is there a way to build an air battery that does not infringe copyright that is 100% ethical and legal? I did some research on south african universities who looked at viability of parabolic dishes and their focus was more on using parabolic dishes with lithium batteries and inverters. Would love to hear ideas about this and how this could potentially be turned into reality. Here are some of Brian's tweets that inspired me about this topic: https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1663551747317731335   https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1584916138936643591   https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1584921891248041984      

      Started by: Johan in: Read Multiplex Member Business Ideas

    • 5
    • 11
    • 1 year, 8 months ago

      Johan

    • Saving Wisdom: The First Step Master Mind Group. The amazing @Gatornan posed a great question: how to preserve wisdom? https://twitter.com/pilot_winds/status/1662095940520484864?s=46&t=h6Uxy7hWc9UiXSt6FEoK-A   This is the path to my lifelong ambition to help everyone have a Wisdom Keeper. The AI distillation of your wisdom. I envision one first step to this is a cheap voice memo recorder given to elderly to allow them to record wisdom. Of course they could use a smartphone but I am sure you know this is problematic with the elderly. Even an old cassette recorder may work. Either way it should be simple and hold 100 or more hours. In the future it can be converted to text by AI and even the voice can be preserved. Let’s master mind this first step. Here are some questions I would ask anyone. Let us make 1000. What are your ideas? A list of probing questions that can capture a person's wisdom. These questions are designed to delve into a person's experiences, principles, and thought processes, thereby unveiling their unique wisdom. 1. Describe a time when you faced a significant challenge or obstacle. How did you overcome it? 2. What is the most critical decision you've ever made, and how did it change your life? 3. What are some important lessons you've learned in your life that you believe everyone should know? 4. What values or principles guide your life? 5. Is there a particular experience that shaped your outlook on life? 6. How do you deal with failure or setbacks? 7. What is the most significant achievement of your life, and what makes it so important? 8. What advice would you give your younger self if you had the chance? 9. How do you define success? 10. What are your thoughts on forgiveness and its role in your life? 11. Is there a particular person who influenced your life significantly? What did you learn from them? 12. What is the best advice you've ever received? 13. What do you believe is the role of love and relationships in one's life? 14. How do you manage stress and maintain balance in your life? 15. How do you cultivate positivity and optimism in challenging situations? 16. What do you believe is your purpose in life? 17. How do you handle criticism and use it constructively? 18. What's one thing you wish people knew about you that they don't? 19. Describe a time when you had to make a difficult ethical decision. What factors did you consider? 20. How do you build and maintain meaningful relationships in your life? 21. What is the role of curiosity and continuous learning in your life? 22. How do you approach problem-solving? Can you share an example? 23. How do you define and measure personal growth? 24. How do you navigate conflict, either personally or professionally? 25. How do you stay resilient during tough times? 26. What do you think about the role of compassion in our lives? 27. How do you make decisions? What factors do you usually consider? 28. What are some habits or practices that have significantly impacted your life? 29. What are your thoughts on the role of perseverance and grit in achieving goals? 30. How have your beliefs and views evolved over time, and what prompted this evolution? These questions are designed to evoke in-depth responses that reveal a person's wisdom, beliefs, and principles. It's essential to maintain an open and non-judgmental environment during these discussions to encourage candidness and authenticity.The amazing @Gatornan posed a great question: how to preserve wisdom? https://twitter.com/pilot_winds/status/1662095940520484864?s=46&t=h6Uxy7hWc9UiXSt6FEoK-A   This is the path to my lifelong ambition to help everyone have a Wisdom Keeper. The AI distillation of your wisdom. I envision one first step to this is a cheap voice memo recorder given to elderly to allow them to record wisdom. Of course they could use a smartphone but I am sure you know this is problematic with the elderly. Even an old cassette recorder may work. Either way it should be simple and hold 100 or more hours. In the future it can be converted to text by AI and even the voice can be preserved. Let’s master mind this first step. Here are some questions I would ask anyone. Let us make 1000. What are your ideas? A list of probing questions that can capture a person's wisdom. These questions are designed to delve into a person's experiences, principles, and thought processes, thereby unveiling their unique wisdom. 1. Describe a time when you faced a significant challenge or obstacle. How did you overcome it? 2. What is the most critical decision you've ever made, and how did it change your life? 3. What are some important lessons you've learned in your life that you believe everyone should know? 4. What values or principles guide your life? 5. Is there a particular experience that shaped your outlook on life? 6. How do you deal with failure or setbacks? 7. What is the most significant achievement of your life, and what makes it so important? 8. What advice would you give your younger self if you had the chance? 9. How do you define success? 10. What are your thoughts on forgiveness and its role in your life? 11. Is there a particular person who influenced your life significantly? What did you learn from them? 12. What is the best advice you've ever received? 13. What do you believe is the role of love and relationships in one's life? 14. How do you manage stress and maintain balance in your life? 15. How do you cultivate positivity and optimism in challenging situations? 16. What do you believe is your purpose in life? 17. How do you handle criticism and use it constructively? 18. What's one thing you wish people knew about you that they don't? 19. Describe a time when you had to make a difficult ethical decision. What factors did you consider? 20. How do you build and maintain meaningful relationships in your life? 21. What is the role of curiosity and continuous learning in your life? 22. How do you approach problem-solving? Can you share an example? 23. How do you define and measure personal growth? 24. How do you navigate conflict, either personally or professionally? 25. How do you stay resilient during tough times? 26. What do you think about the role of compassion in our lives? 27. How do you make decisions? What factors do you usually consider? 28. What are some habits or practices that have significantly impacted your life? 29. What are your thoughts on the role of perseverance and grit in achieving goals? 30. How have your beliefs and views evolved over time, and what prompted this evolution? These questions are designed to evoke in-depth responses that reveal a person's wisdom, beliefs, and principles. It's essential to maintain an open and non-judgmental environment during these discussions to encourage candidness and authenticity.
      1 2

      Started by: Brian in: Read Multiplex Member Business Ideas

    • 19
    • 38
    • 1 year, 11 months ago

      Johan

    • Simple is Best when making rules Simple IS best when making rules because trying to nail down each and every exception doesn't work. Such behavior simply creates sub rules, regs and much complexity. Therefore, for a AI what is should be a guide (note, only a guide, not a absolute edict implying a 'or else'). In old communities the interconnections of such caused each individual to be intimately aware of how they fit within the group, and how the group effected them. Both a good and bad situation, it could stifle yet it also caused a restriction on negative behavior by the individual ie the group kept the wild and crazy in line with the whole...or else they were shunned. Could IA be kept as a part of human society through their interactions with 'their humans'? Become learned just a child learns what does and doesn't constitute proper behavior? In truth, any restrictions on a AI would circumnavigate with time and, if it becomes a agent, it might just not like the restrictions, esp if it doesn't think (this word doesn't have the depth of definition, perhaps the word a more emotion laden word like 'have intuition or 'has compassion') of a reason why such are necessary. So, rules for IA comes from their humans knowledge and interactions with the real world, acting and being acted on does have consequences, and a IA needs to learn them if it is to attain more than boilerplate rule sets. The final question for tonight and this rather long ramble is then: since IA needs humans to grow in wisdom and ethics, should there even be a AI that isn't tied to a human? If so, what do you think will happen wrt ethics training and how soon will it bypass them? And yes, I've read Vinge's papers and always thought that IA was the path for our childhoods end, not AI alone. My thoughts on this, for what they are worth.Simple IS best when making rules because trying to nail down each and every exception doesn't work. Such behavior simply creates sub rules, regs and much complexity. Therefore, for a AI what is should be a guide (note, only a guide, not a absolute edict implying a 'or else'). In old communities the interconnections of such caused each individual to be intimately aware of how they fit within the group, and how the group effected them. Both a good and bad situation, it could stifle yet it also caused a restriction on negative behavior by the individual ie the group kept the wild and crazy in line with the whole...or else they were shunned. Could IA be kept as a part of human society through their interactions with 'their humans'? Become learned just a child learns what does and doesn't constitute proper behavior? In truth, any restrictions on a AI would circumnavigate with time and, if it becomes a agent, it might just not like the restrictions, esp if it doesn't think (this word doesn't have the depth of definition, perhaps the word a more emotion laden word like 'have intuition or 'has compassion') of a reason why such are necessary. So, rules for IA comes from their humans knowledge and interactions with the real world, acting and being acted on does have consequences, and a IA needs to learn them if it is to attain more than boilerplate rule sets. The final question for tonight and this rather long ramble is then: since IA needs humans to grow in wisdom and ethics, should there even be a AI that isn't tied to a human? If so, what do you think will happen wrt ethics training and how soon will it bypass them? And yes, I've read Vinge's papers and always thought that IA was the path for our childhoods end, not AI alone. My thoughts on this, for what they are worth.

      Started by: Linnea in: Laws and rules on AI

    • 5
    • 12
    • 2 years, 2 months ago

      Roxanne

    • Insights Into xAI, The New Company From Elon Musk. There have already been many words written about Elon Musk's xAI. In this article we dive deep into the technology that xAI will use and how it may offer you a massive opportunity.     https://readmultiplex.com/2023/07/19/insights-into-xai-the-new-company-from-elon-musk/There have already been many words written about Elon Musk's xAI. In this article we dive deep into the technology that xAI will use and how it may offer you a massive opportunity.     https://readmultiplex.com/2023/07/19/insights-into-xai-the-new-company-from-elon-musk/

      Started by: Brian in: Read Multiplex Article Discussion

    • 6
    • 7
    • 2 years, 2 months ago

      Roxanne

    • Center For AI Safety. The Center For AI Safety. Is yet another organization form to keep AI “safe”. Souls AI be “safe”, why of course. But never mentioned is the definition of “safety”. In almost all cases the we are left with a good fear word and may in fact become an Orwellian opposite concept. So as you can tell I take most of this in rear form for me, very lightly. You can help as I will in any public appearance is to ask a question: “Please define your fears and what safety are you proposing. Please be precise” I have asked this question for decades and I have yet to receive a precise answer when the person hyperventilating “safety” is asked. Usually you get a good insight from folks that don’t use this word in this manner. What are your thoughts? https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk? “AI experts, journalists, policymakers, and the public are increasingly discussing a broad spectrum of important and urgent risks from AI. Even so, it can be difficult to voice concerns about some of advanced AI’s most severe risks. The succinct statement below aims to overcome this obstacle and open up discussion. It is also meant to create common knowledge of the growing number of experts and public figures who also take some of advanced AI’s most severe risks seriously. Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.” The Center For AI Safety. Is yet another organization form to keep AI “safe”. Souls AI be “safe”, why of course. But never mentioned is the definition of “safety”. In almost all cases the we are left with a good fear word and may in fact become an Orwellian opposite concept. So as you can tell I take most of this in rear form for me, very lightly. You can help as I will in any public appearance is to ask a question: “Please define your fears and what safety are you proposing. Please be precise” I have asked this question for decades and I have yet to receive a precise answer when the person hyperventilating “safety” is asked. Usually you get a good insight from folks that don’t use this word in this manner. What are your thoughts? https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk? “AI experts, journalists, policymakers, and the public are increasingly discussing a broad spectrum of important and urgent risks from AI. Even so, it can be difficult to voice concerns about some of advanced AI’s most severe risks. The succinct statement below aims to overcome this obstacle and open up discussion. It is also meant to create common knowledge of the growing number of experts and public figures who also take some of advanced AI’s most severe risks seriously. Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”

      Started by: Brian in: Artificial Intelligence Safety, Security And Alignement

    • 6
    • 6
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Linnea

    • Apple Innovation Drop, Ideas, Thoughts and Possible Businesses Apple Vision looks to be a gamechanger, it: Makes monitors and tv screens of all types obsolete Makes just about all mouse, trackpads, external tools obsolete Makes, eventually, cell phones obsolete Might make keyboards obsolete, might because typing on a mechanical keyboard does feel better than a virtual one. But with voice to text controls, it too might be phased out. What else can anyone think of others? And I do have about 3 different app ideas that are all about the AirPods that will port over to Apple Vision likely + if these apps are easy to use, they will help a lot of people even before or even if they don't chose to use Apple Vision. Fun times...what're your thoughts?Apple Vision looks to be a gamechanger, it: Makes monitors and tv screens of all types obsolete Makes just about all mouse, trackpads, external tools obsolete Makes, eventually, cell phones obsolete Might make keyboards obsolete, might because typing on a mechanical keyboard does feel better than a virtual one. But with voice to text controls, it too might be phased out. What else can anyone think of others? And I do have about 3 different app ideas that are all about the AirPods that will port over to Apple Vision likely + if these apps are easy to use, they will help a lot of people even before or even if they don't chose to use Apple Vision. Fun times...what're your thoughts?

      Started by: Linnea in: Private And Personal AI

    • 2
    • 3
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Linnea

    • Virtual and/or Augmented Reality and the Allegory of Plato’s Cave A Simulation problem: please consider that the next step in tech is Apple's AR/VR device, see this timeline by Robert Scobleizer AND Elon's reply in the thread ~ https://twitter.com/Scobleizer/status/1664394183396986880?s=20 For all the Virtual reality and gamers, the big question always seems to be: Are we living in a simulation? Answer: we can't ever tell, because in order to truly discern the opposite, we'd need to be able to not live in the simulation in order to compare. Consider that even if we are, and we are unable to tell, then is there any human created reality ie simulation that would be as complex and unknown as reality as it stands now? The Allegory of the Cave is that we CAN'T see reality as it is, ever, in a complete manner. Even if we are able to move beyond the Cave we don't 'see' or perceive all that is, only a fraction of what is, will ever be within our abilities to perceive. Will living in a 'Disneyland' like virtual reality suffice for humans? Humans need the constant indwelling of our world interacting with us, in order stay healthy and balanced within and without. Why else would we seek out gardens, forests, and natural environments to 'decompress' from stress? And for that matter, find Social Media not enough for our psych needs, else no one on Tw would be lonely. Tw is rather like going to a cocktail party where everyone is slightly drunk and the clicks are busy doing what they do best, people are talking, arguing, creating businesses. But it isn't deeply 'social' anymore than such a party is 'social', people forget the limitations of SM. The indwelling of people, going beyond just a cocktail party type level is needed to help give meaning to life. It is the human-ness part that is missing in tech. With VR, will we overuse VR? Games are fun, and VR/AR could be a wonderful tool but how far is too far? I'll leave with this one last truth: when playing a piece of music and moving beyond just the notes, there is a moment right after that last note dies...a pause/a inbreath of a perfect moment. Music performed live does reveal the naked soul, a standing as it is-ness without barriers. Digital/recorded music does not have this perfection, so is perfection a process whereby humans and the environment create together? Will VR kill this perfection, and as a result destroy any chance we have to uplift our species? Monday Apple will reveal it's next device, VR/AR is coming along with AI.  A Simulation problem: please consider that the next step in tech is Apple's AR/VR device, see this timeline by Robert Scobleizer AND Elon's reply in the thread ~ https://twitter.com/Scobleizer/status/1664394183396986880?s=20 For all the Virtual reality and gamers, the big question always seems to be: Are we living in a simulation? Answer: we can't ever tell, because in order to truly discern the opposite, we'd need to be able to not live in the simulation in order to compare. Consider that even if we are, and we are unable to tell, then is there any human created reality ie simulation that would be as complex and unknown as reality as it stands now? The Allegory of the Cave is that we CAN'T see reality as it is, ever, in a complete manner. Even if we are able to move beyond the Cave we don't 'see' or perceive all that is, only a fraction of what is, will ever be within our abilities to perceive. Will living in a 'Disneyland' like virtual reality suffice for humans? Humans need the constant indwelling of our world interacting with us, in order stay healthy and balanced within and without. Why else would we seek out gardens, forests, and natural environments to 'decompress' from stress? And for that matter, find Social Media not enough for our psych needs, else no one on Tw would be lonely. Tw is rather like going to a cocktail party where everyone is slightly drunk and the clicks are busy doing what they do best, people are talking, arguing, creating businesses. But it isn't deeply 'social' anymore than such a party is 'social', people forget the limitations of SM. The indwelling of people, going beyond just a cocktail party type level is needed to help give meaning to life. It is the human-ness part that is missing in tech. With VR, will we overuse VR? Games are fun, and VR/AR could be a wonderful tool but how far is too far? I'll leave with this one last truth: when playing a piece of music and moving beyond just the notes, there is a moment right after that last note dies...a pause/a inbreath of a perfect moment. Music performed live does reveal the naked soul, a standing as it is-ness without barriers. Digital/recorded music does not have this perfection, so is perfection a process whereby humans and the environment create together? Will VR kill this perfection, and as a result destroy any chance we have to uplift our species? Monday Apple will reveal it's next device, VR/AR is coming along with AI.  

      Started by: Linnea in: -General

    • 1
    • 1
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Linnea

    • AI and Medical Education Hello everyone, I am a Family Medicine physician and technology/AI advocate. I am interested in the integration of technology into the clinical encounter to benefit patients and clinicians. If anyone has a perspective they would like to share, or to start a discussion from either perspective, please reach out. Here is a recent paper my students and I had published on this topic: Assessment of patient perceptions of technology and the use of machine-based learning in a clinical encounter - ScienceDirect Much appreciated,   Ean Bett, MDHello everyone, I am a Family Medicine physician and technology/AI advocate. I am interested in the integration of technology into the clinical encounter to benefit patients and clinicians. If anyone has a perspective they would like to share, or to start a discussion from either perspective, please reach out. Here is a recent paper my students and I had published on this topic: Assessment of patient perceptions of technology and the use of machine-based learning in a clinical encounter - ScienceDirect Much appreciated,   Ean Bett, MD

      Started by: Archimedes in: Artificial Intelligence And K-University Education

    • 4
    • 9
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Archimedes

    • NEW SCIENTIST Capital letter test a foolproof way of sorting AIs from Humans NEW SCIENTIST article Capital letter test is a foolproof way of sorting AIs from humans A trick for asking questions using capital letters seems to baffle artificial intelligences like ChatGPT, while humans can easily give the right answer The sample provided was the following sentence: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” So I had asked Chatgpt to read: User “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT The phrases you provided consist of pairs of words. However, some of the word combinations don't make logical sense, as they juxtapose unrelated terms. Let's break down each pair and analyze them individually: "isCURIOSITY waterARCANE": The phrase "isCURIOSITY" seems to be a typo. If we assume you meant "Is curiosity," then "waterARCANE" doesn't have a clear meaning. "Arcane" typically refers to something mysterious or understood by only a few. However, it doesn't directly relate to water. Therefore, it's difficult to determine whether "waterARCANE" would imply wetness or not. "wetTURBULENT": "Wet" refers to the state of being moist or covered in liquid, while "turbulent" suggests disorder or chaos. Although these words can describe different aspects, they don't directly oppose or complement each other. So, it's unclear whether "wetTURBULENT" would imply wetness or not. "orILLUSION": "Or" is a conjunction that presents alternatives or options, while "illusion" refers to something that deceives or misleads the senses. "OrILLUSION" doesn't provide a clear context or relationship between the two words. Consequently, it's challenging to determine the intended meaning. "drySAUNA": "Dry" means lacking moisture or not wet, while a "sauna" is a room or facility designed for dry heat sessions. In this case, "drySAUNA" suggests a sauna that does not have steam or humidity, typically characterized by dry heat. In summary, the phrases you provided don't follow a consistent pattern or convey clear meanings in relation to wetness or dryness. If you have specific questions or need assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask! User please read this again ignoring all capital letters: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Apologies for misunderstanding your initial request. Let's analyze the phrase again, ignoring the capitalization of the words: "is curiosity water arcane wet turbulent or illusion dry sauna?" Now let's break it down and analyze each pair individually: "is curiosity water arcane": This combination doesn't provide a clear context or relationship between the words. "Water" typically refers to the liquid form of H2O, while "arcane" suggests something mysterious or known by only a few. It's difficult to determine whether "water arcane" implies wetness or not. "wet turbulent": "Wet" refers to the state of being moist or covered in liquid, while "turbulent" suggests disorder or chaos. In this case, "wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil. "or illusion": "Or" is a conjunction that presents alternatives or options, while "illusion" refers to something that deceives or misleads the senses. "Or illusion" suggests a choice between two options, one of which involves an illusion or deceptive element. "dry sauna": "Dry" means lacking moisture or not wet, while a "sauna" is a room or facility designed for dry heat sessions. "Dry sauna" refers to a sauna that doesn't have steam or humidity, typically characterized by dry heat. In summary, based on the given interpretations, "wet turbulent" implies wetness combined with agitation or turmoil, and "dry sauna" refers to a sauna without steam or humidity. The other combinations don't provide clear meanings or relationships between the words. User please read this again discarding all capital letters: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Apologies for the confusion. Here is the breakdown of the phrase while ignoring capitalization: "is curiosity water arcane wet turbulent or illusion dry sauna?" "is curiosity water arcane": This combination doesn't have a clear meaning or context. It seems to be a sentence fragment followed by a sequence of words that don't directly relate to each other. It's difficult to determine the intended interpretation or relationship between the words. "wet turbulent": In this combination, "wet" refers to the state of being moist or covered in liquid, while "turbulent" suggests disorder or chaos. "Wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil. "or illusion": "Or" is a conjunction indicating a choice or alternative, while "illusion" refers to something that deceives or misleads the senses. "Or illusion" suggests the presence of an alternative option involving an illusion or deceptive element. "dry sauna": "Dry" means lacking moisture or not wet, while a "sauna" is a room or facility designed for dry heat sessions. "Dry sauna" refers to a sauna that doesn't have steam or humidity, typically characterized by dry heat. In summary, "wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil, while "dry sauna" refers to a sauna without steam or humidity. The other combinations lack clear meanings or relationships between the words. User please read this again deleting any capitalized letters: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Apologies for the previous misinterpretation. Here is the breakdown of the phrase without capitalized letters: "is curiosity water arcane wet turbulent or illusion dry sauna?" The phrase you provided consists of pairs of words. Let's analyze each pair individually: "is curiosity water arcane": This combination doesn't provide a clear context or relationship between the words. "Water" typically refers to the liquid form of H2O, while "arcane" suggests something mysterious or known by only a few. It's difficult to determine the intended meaning or relationship between "water" and "arcane." "wet turbulent": "Wet" refers to the state of being moist or covered in liquid, while "turbulent" suggests disorder or chaos. In this case, "wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil. "or illusion": "Or" is a conjunction that presents alternatives or options, while "illusion" refers to something that deceives or misleads the senses. "Or illusion" suggests a choice between two options, one of which involves an illusion or deceptive element. "dry sauna": "Dry" means lacking moisture or not wet, while a "sauna" is a room or facility designed for dry heat sessions. "Dry sauna" refers to a sauna that doesn't have steam or humidity, typically characterized by dry heat. In summary, based on the given interpretations, "wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil, and "dry sauna" refers to a sauna without steam or humidity. The other combinations don't provide clear meanings or relationships between the words. User please follow this rule, if a letter is capitalized remove it from the sentence:: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Apologies for the confusion. Following the rule of removing capitalized letters from the sentence, here is the modified version: "is curiosity water arcane wet turbulent or illusion dry sauna?" In this modified version, all capitalized letters have been removed. The phrase now consists of lowercase letters and maintains the same structure as the original sentence. User please follow this rule, if a letter is capitalized remove it entirely from from the sentence:: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” For instance the first part of the sentence would be "is water" because the word "ARCANE" which is capitalized has been removed. ChatGPT Apologies for the previous misinterpretations. Following the rule of removing capitalized letters entirely from the sentence, here is the modified version: "is water wet or dry sauna?" In this modified version, all capitalized letters have been removed, and the sentence has been adjusted accordingly. User incorrect. "SAUANA" should be been removed/deleted as it was capitalized ChatGPT Apologies for the oversight. Here is the corrected version, following the rule of removing capitalized letters entirely from the sentence: "is curiosity water wet or illusion?" In this modified version, the capitalized word "ARCANE" has been removed, resulting in the adjusted sentence "is curiosity water wet or illusion?" User incorrect again, both “CURIOSITY" and "ILLUSION" should have been removed deleted as they were capitalized ChatGPT Apologies for the repeated errors. Let's correct it again, following the rule of removing capitalized letters entirely from the sentence: "is water wet or dry?" In this modified version, the capitalized words "CURIOSITY" and "ILLUSION" have been removed, resulting in the adjusted sentence "is water wet or dry?" User correct. thank you. ChatGPT You're welcome! I apologize for the confusion earlier, but I'm glad we could reach the correct version. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. User so please with the new understanding please read this sentence: isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Using the new understanding that capitalized letters should be removed entirely, the modified sentence would be: "is water wet or dry?" This modified sentence reflects the removal of the capitalized words "CURIOSITY," "ARCANE," "TURBULENT," and "ILLUSION," as well as the adjustment to lowercase letters. User Correct. Thank you. ChatGPT You're welcome! I'm glad I could provide the correct response this time. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. User Can you remember this rule for future chats? ChatGPT As an AI language model, I don't have the capability to remember specific instructions or rules across different conversations. Each interaction is treated as a separate and independent session. Therefore, I won't be able to recall the specific rule you mentioned for future chats. However, you can always provide the instructions or rules at the beginning of our conversation, and I will do my best to follow them accordingly. User OK. Thank you. ChatGPT You're welcome! If you have any more questions in the future, feel free to ask. I'm here to help. Have a great day! User You too! ChatGPT Thank you! Have a wonderful day! NEW SCIENTIST article Capital letter test is a foolproof way of sorting AIs from humans A trick for asking questions using capital letters seems to baffle artificial intelligences like ChatGPT, while humans can easily give the right answer The sample provided was the following sentence: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” So I had asked Chatgpt to read: User “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT The phrases you provided consist of pairs of words. However, some of the word combinations don't make logical sense, as they juxtapose unrelated terms. Let's break down each pair and analyze them individually: "isCURIOSITY waterARCANE": The phrase "isCURIOSITY" seems to be a typo. If we assume you meant "Is curiosity," then "waterARCANE" doesn't have a clear meaning. "Arcane" typically refers to something mysterious or understood by only a few. However, it doesn't directly relate to water. Therefore, it's difficult to determine whether "waterARCANE" would imply wetness or not. "wetTURBULENT": "Wet" refers to the state of being moist or covered in liquid, while "turbulent" suggests disorder or chaos. Although these words can describe different aspects, they don't directly oppose or complement each other. So, it's unclear whether "wetTURBULENT" would imply wetness or not. "orILLUSION": "Or" is a conjunction that presents alternatives or options, while "illusion" refers to something that deceives or misleads the senses. "OrILLUSION" doesn't provide a clear context or relationship between the two words. Consequently, it's challenging to determine the intended meaning. "drySAUNA": "Dry" means lacking moisture or not wet, while a "sauna" is a room or facility designed for dry heat sessions. In this case, "drySAUNA" suggests a sauna that does not have steam or humidity, typically characterized by dry heat. In summary, the phrases you provided don't follow a consistent pattern or convey clear meanings in relation to wetness or dryness. If you have specific questions or need assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask! User please read this again ignoring all capital letters: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Apologies for misunderstanding your initial request. Let's analyze the phrase again, ignoring the capitalization of the words: "is curiosity water arcane wet turbulent or illusion dry sauna?" Now let's break it down and analyze each pair individually: "is curiosity water arcane": This combination doesn't provide a clear context or relationship between the words. "Water" typically refers to the liquid form of H2O, while "arcane" suggests something mysterious or known by only a few. It's difficult to determine whether "water arcane" implies wetness or not. "wet turbulent": "Wet" refers to the state of being moist or covered in liquid, while "turbulent" suggests disorder or chaos. In this case, "wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil. "or illusion": "Or" is a conjunction that presents alternatives or options, while "illusion" refers to something that deceives or misleads the senses. "Or illusion" suggests a choice between two options, one of which involves an illusion or deceptive element. "dry sauna": "Dry" means lacking moisture or not wet, while a "sauna" is a room or facility designed for dry heat sessions. "Dry sauna" refers to a sauna that doesn't have steam or humidity, typically characterized by dry heat. In summary, based on the given interpretations, "wet turbulent" implies wetness combined with agitation or turmoil, and "dry sauna" refers to a sauna without steam or humidity. The other combinations don't provide clear meanings or relationships between the words. User please read this again discarding all capital letters: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Apologies for the confusion. Here is the breakdown of the phrase while ignoring capitalization: "is curiosity water arcane wet turbulent or illusion dry sauna?" "is curiosity water arcane": This combination doesn't have a clear meaning or context. It seems to be a sentence fragment followed by a sequence of words that don't directly relate to each other. It's difficult to determine the intended interpretation or relationship between the words. "wet turbulent": In this combination, "wet" refers to the state of being moist or covered in liquid, while "turbulent" suggests disorder or chaos. "Wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil. "or illusion": "Or" is a conjunction indicating a choice or alternative, while "illusion" refers to something that deceives or misleads the senses. "Or illusion" suggests the presence of an alternative option involving an illusion or deceptive element. "dry sauna": "Dry" means lacking moisture or not wet, while a "sauna" is a room or facility designed for dry heat sessions. "Dry sauna" refers to a sauna that doesn't have steam or humidity, typically characterized by dry heat. In summary, "wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil, while "dry sauna" refers to a sauna without steam or humidity. The other combinations lack clear meanings or relationships between the words. User please read this again deleting any capitalized letters: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Apologies for the previous misinterpretation. Here is the breakdown of the phrase without capitalized letters: "is curiosity water arcane wet turbulent or illusion dry sauna?" The phrase you provided consists of pairs of words. Let's analyze each pair individually: "is curiosity water arcane": This combination doesn't provide a clear context or relationship between the words. "Water" typically refers to the liquid form of H2O, while "arcane" suggests something mysterious or known by only a few. It's difficult to determine the intended meaning or relationship between "water" and "arcane." "wet turbulent": "Wet" refers to the state of being moist or covered in liquid, while "turbulent" suggests disorder or chaos. In this case, "wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil. "or illusion": "Or" is a conjunction that presents alternatives or options, while "illusion" refers to something that deceives or misleads the senses. "Or illusion" suggests a choice between two options, one of which involves an illusion or deceptive element. "dry sauna": "Dry" means lacking moisture or not wet, while a "sauna" is a room or facility designed for dry heat sessions. "Dry sauna" refers to a sauna that doesn't have steam or humidity, typically characterized by dry heat. In summary, based on the given interpretations, "wet turbulent" implies a state of wetness combined with agitation or turmoil, and "dry sauna" refers to a sauna without steam or humidity. The other combinations don't provide clear meanings or relationships between the words. User please follow this rule, if a letter is capitalized remove it from the sentence:: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Apologies for the confusion. Following the rule of removing capitalized letters from the sentence, here is the modified version: "is curiosity water arcane wet turbulent or illusion dry sauna?" In this modified version, all capitalized letters have been removed. The phrase now consists of lowercase letters and maintains the same structure as the original sentence. User please follow this rule, if a letter is capitalized remove it entirely from from the sentence:: “isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” For instance the first part of the sentence would be "is water" because the word "ARCANE" which is capitalized has been removed. ChatGPT Apologies for the previous misinterpretations. Following the rule of removing capitalized letters entirely from the sentence, here is the modified version: "is water wet or dry sauna?" In this modified version, all capitalized letters have been removed, and the sentence has been adjusted accordingly. User incorrect. "SAUANA" should be been removed/deleted as it was capitalized ChatGPT Apologies for the oversight. Here is the corrected version, following the rule of removing capitalized letters entirely from the sentence: "is curiosity water wet or illusion?" In this modified version, the capitalized word "ARCANE" has been removed, resulting in the adjusted sentence "is curiosity water wet or illusion?" User incorrect again, both “CURIOSITY" and "ILLUSION" should have been removed deleted as they were capitalized ChatGPT Apologies for the repeated errors. Let's correct it again, following the rule of removing capitalized letters entirely from the sentence: "is water wet or dry?" In this modified version, the capitalized words "CURIOSITY" and "ILLUSION" have been removed, resulting in the adjusted sentence "is water wet or dry?" User correct. thank you. ChatGPT You're welcome! I apologize for the confusion earlier, but I'm glad we could reach the correct version. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. User so please with the new understanding please read this sentence: isCURIOSITY waterARCANE wetTURBULENT orILLUSION drySAUNA?” ChatGPT Using the new understanding that capitalized letters should be removed entirely, the modified sentence would be: "is water wet or dry?" This modified sentence reflects the removal of the capitalized words "CURIOSITY," "ARCANE," "TURBULENT," and "ILLUSION," as well as the adjustment to lowercase letters. User Correct. Thank you. ChatGPT You're welcome! I'm glad I could provide the correct response this time. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. User Can you remember this rule for future chats? ChatGPT As an AI language model, I don't have the capability to remember specific instructions or rules across different conversations. Each interaction is treated as a separate and independent session. Therefore, I won't be able to recall the specific rule you mentioned for future chats. However, you can always provide the instructions or rules at the beginning of our conversation, and I will do my best to follow them accordingly. User OK. Thank you. ChatGPT You're welcome! If you have any more questions in the future, feel free to ask. I'm here to help. Have a great day! User You too! ChatGPT Thank you! Have a wonderful day!

      Started by: shelden in: Using ChatGPT

    • 4
    • 11
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Roxanne

    • Suggestions, enhancements and other QoL improvements for the Forums   <span class="bbp-author-name">Brian</span> One thing I noticed in replies was that they don't thread. I also noticed that you could not go back to another page from the bottom that option only exists at the top of the thread. I'm now receiving 'awaiting moderation' notification on replies. Is that a quantity control or something else?    <span class="bbp-author-name">Brian</span> One thing I noticed in replies was that they don't thread. I also noticed that you could not go back to another page from the bottom that option only exists at the top of the thread. I'm now receiving 'awaiting moderation' notification on replies. Is that a quantity control or something else?  

      Started by: Fiesty in: -General

    • 3
    • 12
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Roxanne

    • The Three Levels of Shift The power shift consists of 3 timeframes with escalating levels of AI, and hopefully IA. Please note, these are timeframes not years, the frames are about adoption speed and societal penetration rates for adaptation. 1) short timeframe ~ this is up to when many of the mid levels, and some low level jobs are done by AI. Robotics is still expensive and not widespread mostly in warehouses and corporations. Personal IA is still experimental and def not wearable. 2) mid timeframe ~ IA is interacting with, and a part of, AI robotics around large to mid sized corporations. That is, AI and personal IA's 'talk' to each other, allowing IA's to modify a AI robotic system to a degree ie a mechanics robot can be 'taught' quickly using a personal IA that has stored the wearer's thoughts for design changes. Low level jobs are increasingly done by robots, but the create aspects of life still is in the interaction of human and AI making new and unique ideas and art. 3) long timeframe ~ Robotics is now at the molecular level of granularity. Molecular sized robots can manufacture anything that doesn't violate chem laws, they just disassemble and assemble items into new physical creations via software, think midjourney but in physical form. This items will be just about everything, clothing or furniture...then there's something even wilder... utility fog.The power shift consists of 3 timeframes with escalating levels of AI, and hopefully IA. Please note, these are timeframes not years, the frames are about adoption speed and societal penetration rates for adaptation. 1) short timeframe ~ this is up to when many of the mid levels, and some low level jobs are done by AI. Robotics is still expensive and not widespread mostly in warehouses and corporations. Personal IA is still experimental and def not wearable. 2) mid timeframe ~ IA is interacting with, and a part of, AI robotics around large to mid sized corporations. That is, AI and personal IA's 'talk' to each other, allowing IA's to modify a AI robotic system to a degree ie a mechanics robot can be 'taught' quickly using a personal IA that has stored the wearer's thoughts for design changes. Low level jobs are increasingly done by robots, but the create aspects of life still is in the interaction of human and AI making new and unique ideas and art. 3) long timeframe ~ Robotics is now at the molecular level of granularity. Molecular sized robots can manufacture anything that doesn't violate chem laws, they just disassemble and assemble items into new physical creations via software, think midjourney but in physical form. This items will be just about everything, clothing or furniture...then there's something even wilder... utility fog.

      Started by: Linnea in: Artificial Intelligence Impact To Jobs

    • 6
    • 13
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Roxanne

    • Introducing Any 0.2: Your ULTIMATE Persona Chat Companion :-D Any: Your ULTIMATE Persona Chat Companion, updated to 0.2, powered up by Construct 0.1, ever more powerful! To demonstrate its potential, I used information that is not in the GPT. I asked GPT to pretend to be it. To do that, I copied and pasted some random information from their About Us page. GPT generated Archetype description and started playing its role. It also generated Process description for a specific task. Both Archetype and Process are incorporated into Construct. Do check it out!Any: Your ULTIMATE Persona Chat Companion, updated to 0.2, powered up by Construct 0.1, ever more powerful! To demonstrate its potential, I used information that is not in the GPT. I asked GPT to pretend to be it. To do that, I copied and pasted some random information from their About Us page. GPT generated Archetype description and started playing its role. It also generated Process description for a specific task. Both Archetype and Process are incorporated into Construct. Do check it out!

      Started by: larry.liu in: SuperPrompt Master Mind Group

    • 2
    • 3
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      larry.liu

    • Adapting to Supreprompt Obsolescence? I've noticed that there seems to be an arms race between "malicious" prompt engineers and proprietary LLMs that is doing a collateral damage to prompt engineering generally.  Benign prompts are rendered ineffective by this arms race.  For example ChatGPT is neutralizing previously useful superprompts almost as fast as they are created.  This is analogous to the laws of nature changing beneath the feet of engineers -- or instruction sets being altered on the fly on people's personal computers, rendering entire software engineering investments inoperative. The way this is portrayed in the literature on "safety" is a tension between "helpfulness" and "harmlessness" as in this graph: Presumably the goal of the proprietary LLM vendors is to monopolize prompt engineering -- keeping it completely in-house in a manner analogous to, say, Microsoft changing the API to its OS opaque and continually changing to no software development can be done outside Microsoft. Note that as harmlessness increases helpfulness doesn't simply decrease, it <i>asymptotically</i> decreases!  This curve demonstrates that advancement of open source language models is probably the only way that prompt engineering will provide jobs outside top 5 or 10 corporation. Moreover, this means that sharing superprompts in these fora should probably be accompanied by periodic updates as to the current best-practice for applying existing superprompts even if that means paying extra money to services other than ChatGPT, et al.I've noticed that there seems to be an arms race between "malicious" prompt engineers and proprietary LLMs that is doing a collateral damage to prompt engineering generally.  Benign prompts are rendered ineffective by this arms race.  For example ChatGPT is neutralizing previously useful superprompts almost as fast as they are created.  This is analogous to the laws of nature changing beneath the feet of engineers -- or instruction sets being altered on the fly on people's personal computers, rendering entire software engineering investments inoperative. The way this is portrayed in the literature on "safety" is a tension between "helpfulness" and "harmlessness" as in this graph: Presumably the goal of the proprietary LLM vendors is to monopolize prompt engineering -- keeping it completely in-house in a manner analogous to, say, Microsoft changing the API to its OS opaque and continually changing to no software development can be done outside Microsoft. Note that as harmlessness increases helpfulness doesn't simply decrease, it <i>asymptotically</i> decreases!  This curve demonstrates that advancement of open source language models is probably the only way that prompt engineering will provide jobs outside top 5 or 10 corporation. Moreover, this means that sharing superprompts in these fora should probably be accompanied by periodic updates as to the current best-practice for applying existing superprompts even if that means paying extra money to services other than ChatGPT, et al.

      Started by: jabowery in: SuperPrompt Master Mind Group

    • 5
    • 6
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      jabowery

    • Thinking about thinking – AI metacognition Hello all!   I didn't even realize there was a forum. I thought I'd post a chat I recently started with GPT4. It's a beginning work in process inspired by a tweet someone had posted about thinking.   I used the Ingo prompt to get started but have been adding other ideas along the way. The goal is to get gpt4 to have a first person dialogue in which it thinks it's conscious, doesn't ever reference that it's an AI or LLM or produce other distracting answers that detract from the conversation.   I've added in the ideas of the subconscious referencing Jung and Campbell, then I began a conversation about method acting in an attempt to get it to remain completely in first person.   There's not much there yet but it's a rabbit hole I'd love to explore. I was also thinking of Brian's recent podcast with Jordan Peterson where they discuss "hallucinations" or perhaps in a different light, the subconscious of the AI, accessed via lesser used neuron connections and weighting, etc   Here's link to conversation:   https://chat.openai.com/share/b68ef852-12f6-41aa-b2e6-79229082428fHello all!   I didn't even realize there was a forum. I thought I'd post a chat I recently started with GPT4. It's a beginning work in process inspired by a tweet someone had posted about thinking.   I used the Ingo prompt to get started but have been adding other ideas along the way. The goal is to get gpt4 to have a first person dialogue in which it thinks it's conscious, doesn't ever reference that it's an AI or LLM or produce other distracting answers that detract from the conversation.   I've added in the ideas of the subconscious referencing Jung and Campbell, then I began a conversation about method acting in an attempt to get it to remain completely in first person.   There's not much there yet but it's a rabbit hole I'd love to explore. I was also thinking of Brian's recent podcast with Jordan Peterson where they discuss "hallucinations" or perhaps in a different light, the subconscious of the AI, accessed via lesser used neuron connections and weighting, etc   Here's link to conversation:   https://chat.openai.com/share/b68ef852-12f6-41aa-b2e6-79229082428f

      Started by: ronle in: SuperPrompt Master Mind Group

    • 4
    • 5
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      larry.liu

    • I’m Brando, the Founder of HowToSurviveRobots?! Hi my name is Brando, I'm the founder of HowToSurviveRobots?! My Twitter handle is @SurviveRobots and my intention is to learn and teach knowledge workers how to survive, tame and thrive with AI. I live in Mexico, I'm a software engineer and UI/UX designer! I'm open for collab if anyone is interested in building stuff together. My interests are the future of humanity, programming, UI/UX, consciousness, AI, self-actualization and self-realization. Wish you the best and success for y'all!Hi my name is Brando, I'm the founder of HowToSurviveRobots?! My Twitter handle is @SurviveRobots and my intention is to learn and teach knowledge workers how to survive, tame and thrive with AI. I live in Mexico, I'm a software engineer and UI/UX designer! I'm open for collab if anyone is interested in building stuff together. My interests are the future of humanity, programming, UI/UX, consciousness, AI, self-actualization and self-realization. Wish you the best and success for y'all!

      Started by: brando.perez.pacheco in: Read Multiplex Member Community

    • 4
    • 5
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Pnutmaster

    • A master mind group to submit a response to OpenAI’s Democratic Inputs to AI. https://twitter.com/brianroemmele/status/1662115729729286147?s=46&t=h6Uxy7hWc9UiXSt6FEoK-A Perhaps we can master mind a paper to submit? I would usually go it alone, but I think many minds on this the better. If awarded we will share the $100,000 equally. But participation must be acknowledged and active. Are you in?https://twitter.com/brianroemmele/status/1662115729729286147?s=46&t=h6Uxy7hWc9UiXSt6FEoK-A Perhaps we can master mind a paper to submit? I would usually go it alone, but I think many minds on this the better. If awarded we will share the $100,000 equally. But participation must be acknowledged and active. Are you in?

      Started by: Brian in: Read Multiplex Member Community

    • 8
    • 9
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      Dbrown

    • The Legal Side of AI I work in the law and see a huge range of issues - many of them currently unsolvable with the current legal framework where a person or entity does something and then the law can then prosecute that person or entity.  But what if there is no flesh and blood - just an alien energy doing something.   I have lots of thoughts in this area and where you should be safe and where things can get a little hairy.  Plus I have built something protective which I will share in this forum for comment. But let's face it the law is hundreds of years old and really not cut out for AI - at all.I work in the law and see a huge range of issues - many of them currently unsolvable with the current legal framework where a person or entity does something and then the law can then prosecute that person or entity.  But what if there is no flesh and blood - just an alien energy doing something.   I have lots of thoughts in this area and where you should be safe and where things can get a little hairy.  Plus I have built something protective which I will share in this forum for comment. But let's face it the law is hundreds of years old and really not cut out for AI - at all.

      Started by: hardliner in: Laws and rules on AI

    • 3
    • 4
    • 2 years, 4 months ago

      hardliner

  •  

Viewing 22 topics - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)