Archimedes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Archimedes
    Participant
      • Offline
      • @archimedes

      I’m finally getting a chance to dive into this piece… Incredible.

      I’ll be incorporating the different types of prompts into a presentation I’m giving next month on the topic of AI and Medical Education: “You, Me, and ChatGPT.”

      I will share it here when able.

      Thank you.

      in reply to: AI and Medical Education #14771
      Archimedes
      Participant
        • Offline
        • @archimedes

        Thank you, Linnea. I am familiar with Shkreli, but haven’t seen the interview. I will check it out. Much appreciated. – Ean

        in reply to: AI and Medical Education #13924
        Archimedes
        Participant
          • Offline
          • @archimedes

          Maxfin, I am in full agreement; the MIC must go. There is now more than enough medical knowledge about human biology (anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, et al) in easy-to-learn and understandable formats that most people could successfully navigate most acute and chronic medical needs with the use of an AI-clinician. Medical emergencies [(acute bleeding, broken bones, myocardial infarctions (heart attack), cerebrovascular accidents (strokes)] would likely still benefit from human physician interventions for now.

          However, my own clinical experience, research, and evaluation of the available academic literature, leads me to believe there will still be a desire and role for human-to-human (patient-to-physician) interactions for many people for years to come. At this point, I’m open to a wide variation of AI, clinician, and patient interactions.

          in reply to: AI and Medical Education #13922
          Archimedes
          Participant
            • Offline
            • @archimedes

            I agree, Linnea. I also think because of their glacial pace of change, Medicine and Education could also be prime candidates for significant disruption, and perhaps, easier than one might think.

            I advocate for patient/student interventions in these fields because the medical industrial complex (private insurance, pharma, academic medicine) are not incentivized to do anything other than protect the status quo and/or grow profit margins.

            There are glimmers of hope from outside the entrenched systems for these changes to come sooner rather than later.

            in reply to: AI and Medical Education #13224
            Archimedes
            Participant
              • Offline
              • @archimedes

              Agreed, Brian. We think future iterations of technology in clinical encounters should be scrutinized by patients and physicians alike; different iterations could, should, and can be used to fit each patient’s needs and desires.

              There has been some excitement within the Medical AI community regarding this paper, but the community itself is fairly nascent, though led by the American Board of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (ABAIM), led by Anthony Chang, MD and several other physician luminaries.

              Medical students in particular are excited by this work and I have been fortunate to collaborate with several more as a result of this initial team; there are now other projects underway. I will share them here as they become available for feedback.

            Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)