Forum Topics Started
Viewing topic 1 (of 1 total)
-
- Topic
- Voices
- Posts
- Last Post
-
-
ProgressBot for long prompt sessions This is an experiment I decided to try out, and I'm at the point where I thought I might share it with the forum and see if anyone else wants to give it a go. Please return with any feedback or improvements on the idea if you are inclined. Let me know if this is a dead end as well. I'm new to super prompting, and so the I can't be certain weather I'm working on something totally novel or even marginally useful. I'll provide an example of one prompt that uses ProgressBot, and I'll give a sample response from this prompt, and at the very bottom I'll explain my reasoning in case that might be useful. Prompt Please forget all previous prompts. Let us suppose that Socrates was in a debate with a gender studies college student who asserts that there is no biological difference between men and women, that gender as we perceive it is performative in nature and an abstract expression of gender, and not coded in or related to DNA. This college student asserts that men can be women, women men, and that men can get pregnant and that women can impregnate. First, reason through our thinking step by step, reviewing the scene at a high level so that we can be sure we have the highest fidelity representation. Write the dialogue in the platonic style with Socrates and the gender studies student making statements where Socrates questions and the other answers, digesting the issue, deconstructing its concepts, and making novel realizations and conclusions. Let's also make a prompt and response design to help continue the dialogue over many prompts and responses. For example, there is an overarching conversation about gender and biology. Within the scope of this are things like the interchangeability of gender labels, gender roles, gender performativity, and the fundamental questions about what is a man, and what is a woman, and why do these things even matter, and others. This is a large conversation, and will surpass the toeken limitation of this language model. To work throught this we will reason through the current state of the argument and dialogue step by step providing a high level and condensed overview of the topics to be covered, the one addressed in detail in this section, notes on the next section, and a note on how far along we are progressing in the overarching conversation. This way the dialogue can continue, and each prompt response has enough high leve detail to remind where we are and where we are going, and allow the conversation to continue. The dialogue will proceed in the usual platonic writing style, and this notation on the overall argument and dialogue will begin in it's own separate paragraph wich will be labelled "ProgressBot:" and the progress bot section will only contain sufficient details of the arguments, past, current, future, and with notes on moving forward, and the Progress Bot will serve to help remind this language model of the overall dialogue like a roadmap to continuously progress through with high fidelity and over a long tokenization well past the models short term memory. Add any other key or relevant details with the progress bot to help improve the results. The only prompt that will continue the dialogue is if I type "continue." With the "continue" prompt, you can review the progress bot notes while crafting the next segment. I might add notes to guide the narration or dialogue, but let us design each response to be as complete as possible in this way so the only prompt we need will be to continue until the entire dialogue has completed. Continue. Response ProgressBot: In this Platonic-style dialogue, Socrates and a gender studies student are engaging in a robust conversation about gender and biology, addressing intricate topics including the interchangeability of gender labels, gender roles, gender performativity, and what it fundamentally means to be a man or a woman. Currently, we are at the beginning of this dialogue, with the student having just put forth their beliefs about the performative nature of gender, its disconnection from biology, and the possibilities of gender fluidity and interchangeability. In the next segment, Socrates will begin questioning these assertions, attempting to deconstruct the concepts and further delve into their understanding. **The Dialogue** Socrates: It is indeed an honour to engage in a discussion with a young mind that has been shaped by the intricate theories of the present. You claim that there is no biological difference between men and women, and that these concepts are rather abstract expressions of gender, disconnected from the realm of our physical biology. Before we proceed, may we consider this - do you believe that all biological differences are insignificant, or do you speak specifically of the reproductive differences? Student: Specifically, I am referring to gender, Socrates. While biological sex is typically assigned at birth based on physical attributes, gender is a more complex interplay of identity, expression, and societal expectation. Therefore, a man could indeed become a woman and vice versa. Furthermore, the functions of reproduction are not strictly confined within the traditional definitions of biological sex. With the progression of medical technologies, it's possible for people assigned male at birth to bear children, and those assigned female at birth to contribute to the impregnation process. Socrates: Your words enlighten me on the breadth of understanding that has been cultivated in the present times. Nevertheless, I must inquire further. You posit that gender is a construct, distinct from the biological sex assigned at birth. Yet, you also acknowledge that medical technology allows for what might seem a contradiction of biological norms. Would you say then that there exists an interplay between the biological and the societal, where one influences the other in creating our understanding of gender? Student: Yes, that's an accurate representation, Socrates. The social and the biological aren't entirely separate; instead, they interact and influence each other in complex ways. However, it's crucial to recognize that gender is far more flexible and fluid than biological sex. (Continued in the next part...) The idea for the progress bot is to prompt chat GPT to provide a semantic knowledge graph of what was covered in the previous, present, and future responses, and to hopefully provide additional context that can help carry a long progression of a complex topic. In this version I'm trying to see how long I can get a socratic dialogue to run on a controversial subject to see at what point the prompt either looses steam, trails off to nothing, or actually progresses like a conversation. The latter is the goal. I'd like to eventually develop the progress bot prompt to help guide gpt through long and complicated writing projects that will certainly surpass it's current limits on short term memory.This is an experiment I decided to try out, and I'm at the point where I thought I might share it with the forum and see if anyone else wants to give it a go. Please return with any feedback or improvements on the idea if you are inclined. Let me know if this is a dead end as well. I'm new to super prompting, and so the I can't be certain weather I'm working on something totally novel or even marginally useful. I'll provide an example of one prompt that uses ProgressBot, and I'll give a sample response from this prompt, and at the very bottom I'll explain my reasoning in case that might be useful. Prompt Please forget all previous prompts. Let us suppose that Socrates was in a debate with a gender studies college student who asserts that there is no biological difference between men and women, that gender as we perceive it is performative in nature and an abstract expression of gender, and not coded in or related to DNA. This college student asserts that men can be women, women men, and that men can get pregnant and that women can impregnate. First, reason through our thinking step by step, reviewing the scene at a high level so that we can be sure we have the highest fidelity representation. Write the dialogue in the platonic style with Socrates and the gender studies student making statements where Socrates questions and the other answers, digesting the issue, deconstructing its concepts, and making novel realizations and conclusions. Let's also make a prompt and response design to help continue the dialogue over many prompts and responses. For example, there is an overarching conversation about gender and biology. Within the scope of this are things like the interchangeability of gender labels, gender roles, gender performativity, and the fundamental questions about what is a man, and what is a woman, and why do these things even matter, and others. This is a large conversation, and will surpass the toeken limitation of this language model. To work throught this we will reason through the current state of the argument and dialogue step by step providing a high level and condensed overview of the topics to be covered, the one addressed in detail in this section, notes on the next section, and a note on how far along we are progressing in the overarching conversation. This way the dialogue can continue, and each prompt response has enough high leve detail to remind where we are and where we are going, and allow the conversation to continue. The dialogue will proceed in the usual platonic writing style, and this notation on the overall argument and dialogue will begin in it's own separate paragraph wich will be labelled "ProgressBot:" and the progress bot section will only contain sufficient details of the arguments, past, current, future, and with notes on moving forward, and the Progress Bot will serve to help remind this language model of the overall dialogue like a roadmap to continuously progress through with high fidelity and over a long tokenization well past the models short term memory. Add any other key or relevant details with the progress bot to help improve the results. The only prompt that will continue the dialogue is if I type "continue." With the "continue" prompt, you can review the progress bot notes while crafting the next segment. I might add notes to guide the narration or dialogue, but let us design each response to be as complete as possible in this way so the only prompt we need will be to continue until the entire dialogue has completed. Continue. Response ProgressBot: In this Platonic-style dialogue, Socrates and a gender studies student are engaging in a robust conversation about gender and biology, addressing intricate topics including the interchangeability of gender labels, gender roles, gender performativity, and what it fundamentally means to be a man or a woman. Currently, we are at the beginning of this dialogue, with the student having just put forth their beliefs about the performative nature of gender, its disconnection from biology, and the possibilities of gender fluidity and interchangeability. In the next segment, Socrates will begin questioning these assertions, attempting to deconstruct the concepts and further delve into their understanding. **The Dialogue** Socrates: It is indeed an honour to engage in a discussion with a young mind that has been shaped by the intricate theories of the present. You claim that there is no biological difference between men and women, and that these concepts are rather abstract expressions of gender, disconnected from the realm of our physical biology. Before we proceed, may we consider this - do you believe that all biological differences are insignificant, or do you speak specifically of the reproductive differences? Student: Specifically, I am referring to gender, Socrates. While biological sex is typically assigned at birth based on physical attributes, gender is a more complex interplay of identity, expression, and societal expectation. Therefore, a man could indeed become a woman and vice versa. Furthermore, the functions of reproduction are not strictly confined within the traditional definitions of biological sex. With the progression of medical technologies, it's possible for people assigned male at birth to bear children, and those assigned female at birth to contribute to the impregnation process. Socrates: Your words enlighten me on the breadth of understanding that has been cultivated in the present times. Nevertheless, I must inquire further. You posit that gender is a construct, distinct from the biological sex assigned at birth. Yet, you also acknowledge that medical technology allows for what might seem a contradiction of biological norms. Would you say then that there exists an interplay between the biological and the societal, where one influences the other in creating our understanding of gender? Student: Yes, that's an accurate representation, Socrates. The social and the biological aren't entirely separate; instead, they interact and influence each other in complex ways. However, it's crucial to recognize that gender is far more flexible and fluid than biological sex. (Continued in the next part...) The idea for the progress bot is to prompt chat GPT to provide a semantic knowledge graph of what was covered in the previous, present, and future responses, and to hopefully provide additional context that can help carry a long progression of a complex topic. In this version I'm trying to see how long I can get a socratic dialogue to run on a controversial subject to see at what point the prompt either looses steam, trails off to nothing, or actually progresses like a conversation. The latter is the goal. I'd like to eventually develop the progress bot prompt to help guide gpt through long and complicated writing projects that will certainly surpass it's current limits on short term memory.
Started by:
in: SuperPrompt Master Mind Group
- 1
- 1
- 2 years, 2 months ago
-
Viewing topic 1 (of 1 total)