[Linnea]

I did find this on BitCoinTalk, if I can post the link here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2188.20

Satoshi makes a comment.

It might be interesting to try becoming one of the BCT members as a personality for the AI.

[Linnea]

So many thoughts that it’s difficult to create a single thread of coherence, but I will try.

It all comes down to: What is mastery of a subject area, and how is it measured ie what criteria can be used?

I designed on paper, once a loooong time ago, a “Interactive Database” for K-12 that did just what you thought is needed, it highlighted or perhaps the phrase might be better stated as user-driven learning. But in K-12, the ‘mastery’ part was and is determined by the criteria that each teacher is REQUIRED to teach, at least theoretically required. This is not so for trades and/or non-school level workers.

So, again ~ how can mastery be determined in ‘the real working world’?

This it the key pivot point, the rest it about how a person can learn in the new environment of IA, and AI. And yes, I’ve ideas on that one too, but without the key point the rest will be moot.

This learning can be set up in the K12 easier, since the ‘mastery’ is signed off by the current crop of teachers, IF IA was available.

I will stop now, I don’t wish to overwhelm you.

There’s a possible thread of learning that each student has within them and will, if given options, lean toward the ‘style’ which suits them. The mastery levels as given by each State’s education guidelines, follow the guidelines and sign off ‘mastery’ and the student is labelled a ‘master’ of it, theoretically.

If this can be set up, a lot of intelligence that is currently squelched by the factory style education system, will be un-squelched. 🙂

[Linnea]

Hello Brian ~

WRT times,

1) is what we’re in now, and it is imperative to have a viable IA working for people before the next level.

2) will hit, or be manifest likely around mid decade, so 2025(ish). Using IA, we’ll be able to create (IDK exactly the comp sci name, a Mesh network?) a set of network connects that use our IAs and transportation system (Tesla’s ‘talk to each other’) to bypass the larger Internet, at least for when we want to, query each other and anon access the ‘net using this transport system. (Probably the above isn’t clear, but terminology for this isn’t something I know well…sorry) So a ‘non-Cloud’, decentralized network via connected devices that talk with each other for purposes of transport…IAs can ‘piggyback’ information exchange on it?<— really, really important. Gov will try to control more and more as they notice the loss of power from how AI and IA is shifting econ and power structures.

3) is a area that depends a lot on integration of AI into manufacturing, so…late decade earliest. It’s the Molecular Nanotechnology aspect that’s going to be key, AI is needed to really be able to move the tooltips for assemblers and disassemblers. When MNT is present we will def be post scarcity since we’ll be able to completely recycle just about everything.

[Linnea]

Hello ~

If you used a specialized and restricted AI as a ‘note taking’ device, the first thing that comes to minds is security and patient privacy esp in a hospital environment. Small practices, indie wouldn’t have as much of a issue since each can control their patient/doctor privacy tech much easier than large centers.

The following, read it or not, is where much of my practical knowledge comes from on this issue. Admittedly, not a huge dataset but it did make a impression on me.

I was volunteering at Stanford and had a simple, very simple suggestion for a search filter that would enable better client to volunteer match. My supervisor, after telling me it wasn’t’ possible, gave me the current system information used at Stanford(this isn’t confidential, you can find out the basic info on the ‘net). It was old, very old (I can’t remember exactly what it was, but Stanford? being in Silicon Valley should have the latest tech, you’d think) the IT people still used it because it had been vetted as secure. They just built anything on top of this old code, it would break often and required constant maintenance, changes were often tricky.

Old systems vs new seems to have the basic problem assurance of medical privacy, solve that one and change will become much easier.

Then there’s the fear factor, even mentioning this observed issue by me, a simple volunteer, causes a bit of concern. All of the peons, like me, were admonished to ‘be quiet, or else’ don’t talk about anything related to clients/medical, since we were not ‘blessed by the medical establishment’ wrt medical privacy.

The above does make it difficult to get people who have ideas to suggest changes. IMHO, Medical and Education areas are the two most glacial wrt underlying change dynamics.

[Linnea]

Hmmm, if we are going to be involved in, as well as become more integrated with energy flow and the digital world.

There’s this deep, deep Socratic tension between ‘you’ and ‘others’.

Both are interchanging ie act and react to each other, aka both are a part of any action, simply because they are intertwined in life, esp in the digital/energy life

Consider this simple precept: Do not Kill.

Simple right? No, not really…how far does do not kill go?

Do not Kill a person? Do not Kill a piece of grass? Do not Kill a idea (energy remember)? Do not Kill…hope?

As we, IA and AI, evolve together this will become more a precept that is valid only between entities ie both and neither, you and other, one and many.

There will not be a ‘set of rules’ that makes sense to apply objectively, context will be paramount.

[Author]

Posts